There have been two (relatively) recent cases of UK citizens ending their lives at Pegasos- without the knowledge of their families. One case was: Alistair Hamilton- which is I believe the gentleman from the link above that unlucksadness posted. More recently, a lady named Anne from Bristol received assisted suicide there. The family are claiming they also weren't told although, supposedly, a text was sent. In both cases though- the families are absolutely furious. I'm not really surprised that they do now insist that families are aware of the decision.
I think these organisations are supposedly non profit. It does seem hugely expensive to me but then- assumably, they couldn't claim to be non profit if they weren't.
I do think this is concerning. I believe healthcare, including euthanasia should be government funded. We should not normalize the commercialization of our health.
I'm not too sure about this... I think the fee needs to be standardized but I think there could be either allegations or genuine complications if our governments started running programmes like these.
Let's say- they have a big pot of money for health and social care. They can either choose to put the money into say a drug rehabilitation programme or, cancer research drugs targetting late stage cancer or, they can fund assisted suicide. What if there isn't quite the money for all?
Wouldn't it save them money to just kill those people off though? Are they able to work? Probably not. Will they ever be able to? Perhaps not. What other needs do they have? Housing needs, benefits. Wouldn't they rather kill them, rather than keep paying out for years on end?
They wouldn't even need to push them into making the decision. They'd simply need to withdraw their support and benefits and healthcare to the point that life became so intolerable, they would decide to leave of their own 'free will'.
It's already happening to an extent. People are having their benefits threatened. People already struggling are being nudged towards considering suicide as it is- I imagine. If our governments start offering it- what's to say they won't accept?
With fewer say disabled people around demanding support, they may withdraw even more support. If there isn't great enough need to provide support for a proportion of people who have specific needs- because so many have chosen to die- will they bother anymore? Are they more likely to provide easy access into a building for 1 disabled person or, 100? They may not bother if it's just 1.
Although it's difficult to believe. I also think organisations like Pegasos and Dignitas are (supposedly) non- profit organisations. I tend to think assisted dying facilities would remain safer out of our governments greedy little hands. I do definitely think they would need strict regulation though. To ensure all was above board.