• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    šŸ‘‰ View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
F

Forever Sleep

Earned it we have...
May 4, 2022
14,943
I sometimes come across the phrase that a person longs to be 'saved' or rescued by another. To be honest- I also used to have similar hopes. I think that's why Jane Eyre appealed to me although, it felt more like they saved one another there.

I also used to feel upset by the phrase: 'You need to love yourself before loving another'. I wasn't sure I could ever accomplish that. I suppose in a way, I became content and regulated enough on my own that I eventually realised I didn't need another.

But- in that heightened state of need. To be so utterly dependent on another- do you suppose many people can cope with that dependency?

I suppose I came to the conclusion that my type of love would be too over- attached to be comfortable for a potential them or me. That's not to say I had much else going for me either! I'm not attractive. But, it was disappointing to feel like even my loving style would likely be slightly toxic.

I imagine it could actually be a recipe for disaster too- if the other person is possessive and manipulative. They may in fact enjoy being that person's only contact.

What do you think? Do some over- attached/ very needy relationships work? Are there some personalities that fit ok with someone who depends on them heavily- in a healthy way? Can a person be 'saved'? Will they ever move beyond a high level of need? If not, can both people live with that comfortably?
 
  • Love
  • Hugs
  • Like
Reactions: horseshoefalls, Surai, FadingSnowFake and 4 others
Dot

Dot

Info abt typng styl on prfle.
Sep 26, 2021
3,670
Depnds on th/ issu

Thre = rsearch whch shws tht stble & helthly attchd ppl cn hlp chnge insecurly attchd ppl in2 also havng helthy attchmmts bt thre wll b lts of factrs playng in2 th/ sccess of tht
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Hugs
Reactions: FadingSnowFake, houseofleaves, darksouls and 5 others
S

Scythe

Lost in a delusion
Sep 5, 2022
763
Same answer as Dot, in most cases yes. This is why you get suicides turned pro-life preaching about stuff like this. And you do see a lot of threads on SS venting about being friendless/lonely.

I can really only be saved by money, I don't want to work, and if it means I have to die, so be it. It doesn't matter what great friends / lovers I have, I'm not working.

I've also seen a bit of threads about chronic pain/illness here and I doubt having a significant other would truly help too much in this case either.
 
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: darksouls and Forever Sleep
SASU-KE

SASU-KE

Mage
Nov 26, 2025
557
No. It's not possible. You have to love yourself first.If you can't fix that issue, you will always be miserable with someone else because you will not even deem yourself worthy enough to love someone else. You will be incapable of love or a loving relationship.
 
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: aufrechtm7, darksouls and Forever Sleep
violetforever

violetforever

Wizard
Dec 24, 2025
608
no. i've seen it in myself and others. it feels worse to see it in someone else than experiencing it yourself.
 
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: aufrechtm7, darksouls and Forever Sleep
mayachcos

mayachcos

Member
Feb 18, 2026
16
At least for me I gave up on my previous SN attempt 3-4 years ago because I met my partner. While I never ended up opening up to them about my suicidal ideation, I felt like they understood what I was going through, and I felt touched that they could love me, even when I could never love myself for who I was. Then again, my suicidal thoughts never did come to a stop even when I was in love+in a relationship, I just stopped trying to actively make attempts on my own life. So, you could say I was never really saved by them, they just delayed the inevitable.
 
  • Hugs
  • Like
Reactions: darksouls, Forever Sleep, SASU-KE and 1 other person
NormallyNeurotic

NormallyNeurotic

Everything is going to be okay ā‹… he/him
Nov 21, 2024
882
I have so much to say about this.

First, I think a lot of less-severely-disabled people would assume a lot of Disabled x Abled relationships are "dependent/needy/over-attached" to begin with. Especially ones regarding mental disability, like CPTSD. But the difference is consent and self-awareness.

It's like assuming a BDSM relationship is abusive because the submissive does everything for the dominant—it just doesn't ring true if you actually look at the context. There are (rare, unfortunately) cases where an abled partner loves being able to be a mentally disabled person's "rock," so to speak, and their threshold for "dependent" is a lot harder to reach. It's why a lot of disabled people do take part in BDSM relationships, the dynamics often require similar consent discussions.

For this reason, it kind of pisses me off when ableds or less-disableds try to act like "you have to heal to love someone" or "a relationship can save you."

Saving as a concept should not be based on the idea of healing completely. That ideal is how you get so many ableds that abandon us when love doesn't cure our afflictions. I was once saved by someone I have romantic feelings for because he kept me from killing myself previously. That is a temporary thing—permanent "saving" is a lot rarer. It does exist, of course, but it's not like people think.

For me, I think to be "saved" would mean showing me once and for all that some people are safe to open up my soul to, which is something I struggle with due to trauma and NPD. I would still struggle with it at times, and maybe not do it for some people in my life, but to know for sure that it is POSSIBLE (and have reminders of that frequently from said partner just by them... existing) would be my version of being saved. Just not being scared of and cautious around everyone in my life.

It's not perfect. Not complete healing. But it involves me being given a vital support that is the beginning of healing.

A lot of my prior abuse is due to how easily I would either rely on others to "fix" me, or be taken advantage of by predators due to my narcissistic tendency to find joy in "fixing" others...
Hidden content
You need to reply to this thread in order to see this content.
...so I also fell victim to always reading the fantasy romances where the MC was "saved" by love. I had no healthy guiding forces in my life, and I was left genuinely believing love was like a story book.


Anyway, all this to say:

  1. The idea of "saving/fixing" that a lot of more abled people rely on is based in ableism and sanism.
  2. Not all dependent relationships are unhealthy.
  3. Most of us can't even be fixed fully by ourselves, let alone someone else. These struggles will always be part of us, we just have to get them to a point where our quality of life is liveable despite it all.

If you have BPD and sometimes need more reassurance than most people about the fact that your partner won't leave you, that's okay. If you have NPD and require a "praise session" by your partner to regulate you every once in a while, that's okay.

If you have CPTSD and sometimes need to be held like your life depends on it while you cry from flashbacks, that's okay. If you have autism and you sometimes need your partner to guide you through soothing methods during meltdowns, that's okay.

True "saving/fixing" doesn't exist. Whether by medication, therapy, your partner, or yourself. But if you are able to live and enjoy life even despite what an ableist/sanist society would call "broken," and if you wouldn't have gotten to that point without your partner... then yeah. They saved you, in a way.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
  • Hugs
  • Like
Reactions: Honeybee, eladeselasol99, Sunü (瓠儳) and 5 others
ironrain

ironrain

Cyanide Rain
Mar 2, 2026
5
It's my fantasy but I believe it's 100% not possible, only in books. In reality people are too selfish to care this much about another person. Plus, to save someone you shouldn't be broken yourself and many people are broken, myself included, I can't imagine saving someone. Moreover, people like me piss me off lol. But being selfish is totally normal, it's in our nature.
 
  • Hugs
Reactions: darksouls and Forever Sleep
GodzillasBiggestFan

GodzillasBiggestFan

Godzilla's Lonely Bestie
Jan 12, 2026
239
i don't know, mainly because i don't know what saving means or how exactly to define it. i think if it is possible though it wouldn't only be a romantic partner. friendship love can be just as important and healing.
 
  • Hugs
  • Like
Reactions: FadingSnowFake, darksouls, NormallyNeurotic and 1 other person
LonelyPrince

LonelyPrince

Rotten to the Core
Dec 12, 2025
160
Unfortunately no. Rationally it is not possible, as much as I'd love for it to be.

I cling to whoever gives me the slightest hint of affection, due to my emotional starvation.
However, if I were to get into a relationship with this mindset I'd make my partner carry a really heavy burden and the relationship would be unbalanced and unstable.
Unfortunately you first need to accept and love yourself before anyone else.

Only you can save yourself, that's why healing is so hard.
A partner or friend can help you, but they cannot save you.
 
  • Hugs
  • Like
Reactions: aufrechtm7, Forever Sleep, darksouls and 1 other person
darksouls

darksouls

Visionary
May 10, 2025
2,862
I think soulmates can save each other, but that does not necessarily have anything to do with romance
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: FadingSnowFake and Forever Sleep
S

SarahThrowsGin

Member
Aug 22, 2025
61
Not in today's world. A whole support system would be necessary, and best built on less fragile foundations than romance.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: GodzillasBiggestFan, darksouls and Forever Sleep
ScaredCutter

ScaredCutter

Neo Universe
Oct 16, 2025
317
yes and no
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: eladeselasol99, darksouls, FadingSnowFake and 1 other person
FadingSnowFake

FadingSnowFake

Enlightened
Nov 25, 2024
1,742
Yes, if they are open to being saved, and open to receiving love. Two people can complete each other, like the perfect pot and lid if they want to fit together, and believe they are good for each other.
 
  • Hugs
  • Love
Reactions: darksouls and Forever Sleep
Onlookerx

Onlookerx

Member
Feb 10, 2026
6
For me it has helped me, when I was younger I was going through a tough time, i'm still occasionally dealing with stuff from what had happened. but with my partner being there has given me a much easier way of escape that the usual stuff i'd resort to.
 
  • Hugs
  • Love
Reactions: Forever Sleep and darksouls
webb&flow

webb&flow

dum spiro spero—take it as it comes
Nov 30, 2024
525
A relationship, like any thing in our lives, can have a positive affect in our lives that has the capability to foster further positive change (given, there is sufficient quality in how your partner approaches the link between you and them).

I don't believe that "no one can be saved, and if you're suicidal it's over".
no one, can be saved, if you're suicidal it's over, i think

Let us invert your question, overmorrow; what if one were to say, "no one can be doomed, if you're not suicidal you've got it made". The bounds of happiness and sorrow are loose parties and bands, with people often passing between these two parties—and even this very analogy is an oversimplification, there are endless kinds of pains but also endless kinds of joys, countless of which we grab a handful of each instant we trek through.

I think it is the common response of a human in any condition, for us to assume the eternity of our current state—the person in joy may silently convict they will enjoy that act forever, the person in pain may silently convict that they will suffer that pathos forever.

I don't think it's as simple as that—I think it is a complex phenomenon that cannot be swiftly summed up in a single statement.

I don't believe a single moment of conscious experience necessarily damns all of our countless other moments and instants that follow this experience or emotion; that is, I don't believe one single moment of suicidality consigns away our entire life to being "barred from salvation".


I will now direct my attention to our fair thread as whole, and note this interesting thing.

How could we be saved if we had not fallen in the first place? How could we be reborn in flames if we had not first been in ashes?

You must be ready to burn yourself in your own flame; how could you rise anew if you have not first become ashes!


I think that our life is a continuous messy expedition of both damnations and salvations all intermitting our path, at times even crossing over and blending into some kind of clusterfuck, that still has its unspeakable harmony that slowly comes out into the traces of patterns. A relationship is the patterns of two lives coming into contact with one another—the closer they come together the more signals are sent and immanated into the bodies (think bodies of water) of one another, the influences confluencing and coalescing.

Just as many things can render us into the feeling of damnation, similarly endless things can draw out within us the sense of salvation.

Why should we wait for someone else to come to us when the world with all its fascinations open wide carries for us countless methods of salvation and fulfillment? Look to the arts, you see the traces of countless souls sketching the patterns within us that we thought we had a claim of strangerhood too—look to the finer corners of the internet, you see humanity open wide, gently speaking in curiosities of the things that dragged their entire lives into realizations of what was clamouring within them.

To grasp harmony within our very own lives, we need not have a saviour; we need no saviour, we have enough control over our own existence, the human mind is a fucky and transcendent thing, we are only in recent times learning of its capacities for reconstruction, and of how it is not only capable but constantly changing in such a manner—constantly reconditioning, constantly growing and notating further the patterns of our very being.

I think having a good life is a combination of various things; it's less of any one thing striking everything from all a zero into one big "salvation", but more of a complex confluence of aspects, somehow creating a… no word for the thing I'm trying to describe. Imagine a space—but it's not merely the area of a stage, not merely any singular volume of air within a stretch of a beautiful public place—no, it's a place that is beyond places, it is a pattern that is beyond mere surfaces—it is a continuous clusterfuck, a constant song, kind of—but it is not one track but a complex intersection of countless tracks, a bunch of lines all scribbling forth and tripping into one another, as they pass, as they grow; much of them clusterfucky, but many of them perfusing in queer resonance, creating something full intense of fuck and song and euphoria cacophony hell anxiety heaven if there is a salvation it does not look like one but it sure as hell feels like one. Salvation is the moment of euphoria we do not expect, it is the divine stretch of a song—it is the kind impression we feel, the unfettered fascination we feel in a face to face with someone who soothes our soul itself. Salvation is the fit of curiosity we are struck with when we find something that rediscovers a part of us we had amnesced to—salvation is in the countless things, the everyday things, the things we might glance over, the things which catch our eye; it is in both those things we do not currently know of and those obsessions which ignite the flames of both our hells and our heavens; the fires of our infernoes and the blazes of our torches. If there is an energy owing to salvation, it is also the energy owing to damnation as well.

It is REVERENCE. It is an intense energy that birthes the essence of these two both—rather it is the same essence, the same child and fetus itself—but having its skin manifested by different hormones. Just as a baby, sexless, in both soul and body (I don't believe in an immaterial soul, I believe these are woven in the same fabric and breathness)—develops into sex through hormones at birth and may grow forth and even change into another sex through further application of hormones—that same common essence of humanity and sex—the damnation and salvation may transition between each other in a manner similar.

But the body of damnation and salvation is far larger than our own human body. It has pronumerous elements—endless kinds of elements coursing through its veins, breathing upon its skin, drinking into its lips, ringing into its ears, singing and whispering chuckling out of its mouth.

And I do not deny the curiosity of the world too rests within the minds and voices of people. Perhaps a good friend or even lover may be like a messenger, informing you of critical truths about the world and even yourself, in a way that opens your eyes further. But a bad friend or even bad lover may be a prophet similarly, shocking you in false truths designed for their exploitation and your own submission. I have not had much experience with bad friendship and even less bad romance, though. I think this notion of salvation is an incomplete view of life; by this view we are constantly being damned and saved all the time, by countless prophets and gods all speaking unto us at once. Just as a person feeling damnation may misrecognize what may be damning them, one feeling salvation may also misrecognize what has saved them. There are many factors, for sure. I think romance is just one element among these—there are countless other paths to a more harmonious existence.
~

If you may be interested in knowing what these other elements that influence the course of meaning and satisfaction in our lives may be, I highly encourage you to explore the work of Dr. Alok Kanojia. I assure you veritably he is not any run-of-the-mill psychiatrist (his own life path included profound loneliness, even a considerable length of literal monkhood in India at one point, as well), and is no stranger to the profound pressure that loneliness can have on one's desire for significance in life.

Loneliness and how it relates to construction of meaning of life:
(Goes into detail of how the common narrative utilizes relationships for this end, but how the ways a person uses relationships to construct meaning in one's life can be travelled through non-relationship means as well.)



This one has a click-baity title—I do believe that self-love is possible, but that its purpose and means can be confusing to understand.
Here, Dr. K. analyzes the subject of self-love and what can ACTUALLY be done about it; deconstructing common paradigms that may be excluding to people who actually struggle with self-love.


He has more content on these subjects as well; I think he is a good source for exploring these kinds of avenues, because of his genuine experience and genuine way of approaching the subjects and topics. I would say he is more interested in genuine results than just gunning for satisfying his viewer; and I would posit this genuinely.

It is possible to love and be loved by another, even without loving yourself. Loving yourself is more of a skill than an inherent trait, and there are many ways to learn it. It's very possible that one may find it easier to develop love for oneself when they are surrounded by people whom they can explore their own self with, people who act as both refuges and expeditions. But then again, the curiosities of the world are their own refuges and expedition themselves—we have so much at our hands, now, and perhaps this possibility itself is enough salvation. Perhaps what we need is not a saviour, but a direction to begin journeying towards. Perhaps we need a path to trek down upon, to explore, more than we need any "one thing" to find, itself. The energy of the path, the sensation coursing through our veins and minds and selves as so much within us is pulled into a course: I think this dynamic tension of possible harmony, that this itself is a kind of relationship.

We have relationships with countless facets of reality; not just people—with art, with beauty, with curiosity, creation, experience, taste, euphoria, surprise, fascination, wanting, pain, catharsis, insight, stillness, music, noise; and most profoundly, our very own inner thoughts. I personally would advocate creating something (anything) and trying to gain skill in it, so we can create an image of our own experience that we can look back into and find curiosity in—but really, any craft or hobby or practice that you take up, that itself is a kind of relationship too. When George Harrison sings "still my guitar, gently weeps", I think there's truly something real in that. It's not just you—it's the physical actions and reactions of your body, and your mind, and the physicality of the instrument—all communicating, all communicating with one another. I have a relationship with these words right now! I'm writing out letters and typing them and the words stare back at me, as if they now have a life of their own. Even text, I can have a relationship with these. Go on and explore all the kinds of relationships you have! People are one facet of this fascination—there are many more, as well. When you feel you tire to talk with another person, there are many other agents of reality, that we may interact withĀ· as well. The faces and inner viscera of a book, the voices of instruments, the sensual sensations of visuals—it seems our friendship need not end where the gaps between us and other people begin. If there is salvation within people, it spills out of them and into every soaky perfusement of this world's richened elaboration, as well. I encourage you to seek this curiosity—and realize that you too are a creator of this. Yes, you!

How could we be saved if we had not fallen in the first place?

Today you still suffer from the many, you individual; today your courage and hopes are undiminished.

But one day the solitude will weary you; one day your pride will yield, and your courage quail. You will one day cry: "I am alone!"

One day you will no longer see your heights, and see too closely your depths; even your sublimity will frighten you like a phantom. You will one day cry: "All is false!"

There are feelings which seek to kill the solitary one; if they do not succeed, then they themselves must die! But are you capable of this—to be a murderer?

Have you ever known, my sibling, the word "contempt"? And the anguish of your justice in being just to those that despise you?

You force many to think differently about you; that, they charge bitterly to your account. You came near to them and yet went past: for that they never forgive you.

You go beyond them: but the higher you rise, the smaller do you appear to the eye of envy. But the flying one is hated most of all.

"How could you be just to me!"—you must say—"I choose your injustice as my proper lot."

They cast injustice and filth at the solitary one: but, my sibling, if you would be a star, you must shine for them none the less on that account!

And be on your guard against the good and the just! They would rather crucify those who create their own virtue—they hate the solitary ones.

Be on your guard, also, against holy simplicity! All that is not simple is unholy to it; it likes to play with fire and burn—at the stake.

And be on your guard, also, against the assaults of your love! Too readily does the recluse offer xeir hand to any one xe meets.

To many you may not give a hand, but only a paw; and I want your paw to have claws.

But the worst enemy you can meet will always be yourself; you ambush yourself in caverns and forests.

You solitary one, you go the way to yourself! And your way leads you past yourself and your seven devils!

You will be a heretic to yourself, and a sorcerer and a soothsayer, and a fool, and a doubter, and a reprobate, and a villain.

You must be ready to burn yourself in your own flame; how could you rise anew if you have not first become ashes!

You solitary one, you go the way of the creator: you will create a god for yourself out of your seven devils!

You solitary one, you go the way of the lover: you love yourself, and on that account you despise yourself, as only the lover can despise.

The lover wants to create because xe despises! What does xe know of love who has not despised that which xe loved!

With your love and with your creating go into your solitude, my sibling; only much later will justice limp after you.

With my tears, go into your solitude, my sibling. I love xem who seeks to create beyond xemself, and thus perishes.

Thus spoke Zarathustra.
If love truly does conquer all, does not that realize too the power of our OWN love? Our OWN cares‽ What WE love and desire for as well‽ Is the love of another person to be our own salvation but OUR own care is to carry no divine power‽ No, our own curiosity is a divine agent of change as well—and it gets to change and ripple and confluence influence flow flow ebb flow it gets to change and modify the world of signals too, it gets to make its scream of musical echo out into the anticipating air of the volume of existence, as well. Who is to say that many other things besides romantic love may indulge in us the taste of salvation, and that we too may take up a role in such a dance, as well? Salvation is not merely a passive process but a dance that we partake in—where we seek things, and find unexpected curiosities as well. What is salvation? I say it is not a thing so rare or far, not at all, I say.

Any good moment is a salvation for us. And any curiosity, any fit of passion, any intense taste—this is another salvation, too. Any thing we look forward to: that very feeling, that sparkle beyond us—why, there are countless things I can go on to describe, now. I have kept you for quite some lines, here—but there are still so many things you and I can go on to find. Let us clink our glasses here, and see what we each can find from here on out. I have to depart, now, for I need to go, to keep on looking. May you find the things of greatest fascination as well—there are many who will not tell you of them, who won't expect them, and many of the greatest things are not so great in seemingness, as well—in countenance they seem of low number but in qualia their sensation is truly infinite. How are we to find the words for such magnificent and minute things? Perhaps we may take time to find the words later—perhaps let us mix all other words of curiosity with that word, concept, "salvation".

"Salvation", there is a Latin word, "Salvē!"—akin our term "Salutations!"—literally meaning "you be well!" in Latin. I also know that "salve" [in English] means "healing balm", too. … I have checked the etymology now. "Salvātiō" in Latin is a noun, roughly meaning "salvation, deliverance", from the verb "salvō"; "to save (make safe or health)". I think there are countless things that imbue in our tastes of mind the sensations of safeness and harmony; even a person in throes of sickness, in paroxysm, may very well to experience tastes of health and harmony, of capability, of being, in a feel of safety. The feeling of safety. We can find such a relaxation in countless places.

Romance is a fine thing indeed—among the many fine things existence doth have to offer. As for what is needed for sensual safety and the ideal of salvation: I would say, that the ideal is not necessary to fulfill to be in goodness, to experience something so good it rings resonances in our neurons wanting to seek—and that such an ideal is not as lofty or out of reach as it may seem, but that the truly satisfying tasty reality is less perfect and more enjoyable than the ideal may construe it to mean. There is salvation beyond romance, I would say. Let's not limit ourselves, but look further—deeper, more variably. We should find what can and cannot be done, and know it, so that our diligences may not be self-limitations but true carefulness.

I think a feeling of goodness, no matter which way one reaches it through, is equally divine, agreeable, and worthy, no matter how one gets there. May such a fine feel be something known by you, dear reader. I give you my well wishes—may we find curiosities unspoken of in our seekings. Salvē!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: whitetaildeer, meddle, Sunü (瓠儳) and 4 others
aufrechtm7

aufrechtm7

My Hachikō
Feb 14, 2026
210
Can confidently say no in most cases because I've already been there, it doesn't matter if you're a male or a female. Trauma bonding isn't a good thing and that's the path a majority of these relationships go down.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Forever Sleep and darksouls
Pluto

Pluto

Cat Extremist
Dec 27, 2020
6,506
605293567_10162341848801274_778872449124285025_n.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Yay!
  • Love
Reactions: webb&flow, Forever Sleep and darksouls
Sunü (瓠儳)

Sunü (瓠儳)

Member
Sep 30, 2023
21
It can happen, but it would not be the method, for what even are the possibilities, would you trust it when it comes, and most importantly would it help you recover at all? — what are people to you? What is this partner to you?

When you desperately want to be saved and assign no faith to yourself, then I know someone who can *really* save you: Jesus Christ! "Repent sinner, you are damned and are headed to hell. Only He can save you!" or any other religious figure which with their grandeur allows one to believe despite skepticism. Does it matter to you that you lie to yourself (when you already do) but this "illusion" can benefit you, and can become a structure of support and affection? The hymns during mass does inspire the allure of salvation and community, other church-goers can help and be affectionate (results in different localities may vary), and funnily you may even join the trend of using it as a way to know other people and get married? Dating apps, be damned. But I ask, is our desire any different? — Do we not desire to be fully understood, loved beyond all our flaws, be helped into our better selves, complementing our personalities? — and we place these characteristics to an ideal of a partner. We place the role of the savior into a human, at least the church, a whole community, is supposed to be there for support when His teachings become too hard to follow.

When we adjust our expectations of the other person, we must also remember that it is okay to grow distant after. If the relationship did not last, it is not an objection to the fact that it was important and beneficial or even life saving. Even bad relationships can help us by requiring more trust into ourselves as defense. It is not the type nor the status of a relationship which facilitates our recovery, but the struggle to be better, which it often inspires in us but it isn't the only source as @webb&flow lists out:
We have relationships with countless facets of reality; not just people—with art, with beauty, with curiosity, creation, experience, taste, euphoria, surprise, fascination, wanting, pain, catharsis, insight, stillness, music, noise; and most profoundly, our very own inner thoughts.
[…]
Go on and explore all the kinds of relationships you have! People are one facet of this fascination—there are many more, as well. When you feel you tire to talk with another person, there are many other agents of reality, that we may interact withĀ· as well. The faces and inner viscera of a book, the voices of instruments, the sensual sensations of visuals—it seems our friendship need not end where the gaps between us and other people begin. If there is salvation within people, it spills out of them and into every soaky perfusement of this world's richened elaboration, as well. I encourage you to seek this curiosity—and realize that you too are a creator of this. Yes, you!
The mistake is putting the emphasis on only an improbable soulmate. The quality of relations for recovery does not depend on the intensity or its emotional closeness; it depends on the resources, knowledge, and strength from which we can derive from them. And in our gratitude, we can offer back what we can in the same currency: the patience and diligence of the ear and heart to empathize, the wit to show them better ways, and lending money, correction, adequate space, warmth—in short, to facilitate their growth—and this effect is what I want to instill to all those I value. There are those that might grimace at the "transactional" feel of this relationship, that we do not love and devote enough to our beloved other, but our other is not Christ and will never be our sole salvation; for we are limited, we take what we can. For there are still many constraints of time, distance, money, culture, knowledge, moods, taste, prejudice which dissuade us in further investment/understanding and in acquiring more friends, it amazes me that such a useful connection even happened and to hold firm the individual considerations for their and our growth (and even beyond us!). Perhaps trading in the intensity and attentive obsession for the weekly meet-up or an occasional date, all for lasting bonds which solidify habitually through time—not only by the moments spent together, but also what we think and daydream of the other in our spare time. Whether we cultivate an air of friendly competition or dependent comfort, many or little friends, real or incorporeal, we are not sinners or broken suicidals waiting to be saved. We are bricoleurs which build our advantages from who and what are nearby and suitable.

But what value do others have to us, when we inhibit ourselves too much? When we force a hypothesis into a conclusion about ourselves, beating ourselves over the "fact" that we are damned, too incapable or undeserving, and to cut the string holding that colorful kite of hope. Seldom do we know the source of the voice. We only know that it diminishes us, and sooner or later, it has to disappear for us to get better. Maybe in our ideal of love, we hoped that we can get better by leaping over our bad selves through someone; but it is likely we desire such a thing because we do not have faith in ourselves anymore. "Love ourselves" but I still don't know what they meant by "love" for there are so many other things hidden inside. In these matters, I invoke Zarathustra for he believes in a different "love" which does not hide its brutality. For in overcoming ourselves, we must over-power and repress and push down aspects of ourselves, in favor of another voice inside us that we regard more highly. We become better by forgetting or attenuating our troubled habits and past, we become better by replacing and reconditioning parts of ourselves. In loving ourselves, we must be ready to outwit, to despise, to destroy aspects of ourselves—not out of spite, self-revenge, guilt, no! Out of love! That is the love of the creator [1], which Zarathustra had called for. In our name, we must carry out the merciless disdain and killing to all that is unsavory and disadvantageous in us. Thus when Zarathustra says, "You must be ready to burn yourself in your own flame; how could you rise anew if you have not first become ashes!" he meant it both with a grim yet excited tone. And his question prior should ring pensively to our ears, "But are you capable of being a murderer?"


(note: when I say 'you' or 'we' I am not talking directly to anyone, just the imaginary audience I have in mind.)
[1]: Certainly creating the vision of ourselves. Relevant quote, "But I am always driven anew to human beings by my ardent will to create; thus the hammer is driven toward the stone. Oh you human beings, in the stone sleeps an image, the image of my images! A shame it must sleep in the hardest, ugliest stone! Now my hammer rages cruelly against its prison. Shards shower from the stone: what do I care?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: darksouls and Forever Sleep
Honeybee

Honeybee

God's Favourite šŸ¤ they/them
Feb 14, 2026
19
This isn't a romantic situation, but, my bestfriend and I 'saved' each other. I got her through her worst, and she's helping me with some of mine.

I can't remember a time where I didn't want to ctb or think it was inevitable. My 'recovery' is slow, or maybe not at all. But, I'm here longer because of her, and when we're together I rarely think about it. As for her, she says that she's happier and better off. She doesn't want to die anymore, not actively at least, and she even threw out what she planned to use.

I don't think either of us minds the dependency. At least we're aware it's not the most healthy dynamic. I am her reason, and she is mine.
 
  • Love
Reactions: GodzillasBiggestFan, darksouls and Forever Sleep
F

Forever Sleep

Earned it we have...
May 4, 2022
14,943
This isn't a romantic situation, but, my bestfriend and I 'saved' each other. I got her through her worst, and she's helping me with some of mine.

I can't remember a time where I didn't want to ctb or think it was inevitable. My 'recovery' is slow, or maybe not at all. But, I'm here longer because of her, and when we're together I rarely think about it. As for her, she says that she's happier and better off. She doesn't want to die anymore, not actively at least, and she even threw out what she planned to use.

I don't think either of us minds the dependency. At least we're aware it's not the most healthy dynamic. I am her reason, and she is mine.

That sounds like a beautiful friendship. I did also experience this with my best friend for a while. It is something truly special. I'm glad you both have this.
 
  • Love
Reactions: darksouls and Honeybee

Similar threads

F
Replies
5
Views
199
Offtopic
ctwc
ctwc
F
Replies
2
Views
158
Offtopic
NormallyNeurotic
NormallyNeurotic
F
Replies
3
Views
184
Offtopic
ColorlessTrees
ColorlessTrees
N
Replies
0
Views
107
Offtopic
noname223
N
F
Replies
5
Views
250
Offtopic
DarkRange55
DarkRange55