• ⚠️ UK Access Block Notice: Beginning July 1, 2025, this site will no longer be accessible from the United Kingdom. This is a voluntary decision made by the site's administrators. We were not forced or ordered to implement this block.

Dante_

Dante_

Global Mod | No future
Feb 27, 2025
332
So, lately there's been a bit of discussion about PC SN as a source, quite frankly, this post is for harm reduction purposes...a few years ago, there was a user who attempted with the same source and it ended up being quite a terrible experience so in all honesty, any mention of this source shouldn't be as a viable one and anyone stating that it is and to just drink more than what's in the protocol to compensate for the lower purity is being harmful, whether knowingly or not.

 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Hmph!
Reactions: opheliaoveragain, Upon a hanging Body, rozeske and 3 others
Upon a hanging Body

Upon a hanging Body

October will cure me
Jan 5, 2025
1,185
I completely disagree with this , as someone who has taken and survived PC SN.
I feel that it's definitely viable , everything happened exactly how it was supposed to for me besides the amount of puking I went through.

I just believe this source should be treated differently and the procedure for taking it should be chanced compared to how other sources .

If need be I'll go out of my own way to make a procedure and make a record of me ctb in a post just to prove myself and this source.
 
Dante_

Dante_

Global Mod | No future
Feb 27, 2025
332
I completely disagree with this , as someone who has taken and survived PC SN.
I feel that it's definitely viable , everything happened exactly how it was supposed to for me besides the amount of puking I went through.

I just believe this source should be treated differently and the procedure for taking it should be chanced compared to how other sources .

If need be I'll go out of my own way to make a procedure and make a record of me ctb in a post just to prove myself and this source.
The purpose of this post was to avoid an argument but anyway here's my point, this source has been proven to be more than likely to cause harm than not and honestly, telling people to just take more at 30g than 25g which is should be the standard isn't a good thing in my opinion because at that stage, there could be completely different variables that no one can predict and all that just to compensate for the sources uniqueness doesn't make sense. I'm not even sure this source is discussed as it demonstrated to not be pure enough. Finally, I understand if its worth the risk to others but this post to highlight that this source has been problematic regarding posts from years gone by, there is no necessity on your part to prove anything nor record it, im absolutely against that just to prove the viability of a source.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Hmph!
Reactions: opheliaoveragain, Upon a hanging Body, divinemistress36 and 1 other person
R

rozeske

Maybe I am the problem
Dec 2, 2023
4,104
Imo it shouldn't be considered a viable sn source if people follow protocol and survive hours later without medical intervention. It could still be a harmful substance, show similar side effects, cause damage to an extent or even be a lethal one at a certain dosage, it just shouldn't be discussed as the right sn and followed with the same sn protocol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: opheliaoveragain and Dante_
Hiro Uchiha

Hiro Uchiha

Student
Oct 7, 2025
165
That's interesting. Would you think a second dose after emesis would yield success?
 
Upon a hanging Body

Upon a hanging Body

October will cure me
Jan 5, 2025
1,185
That's interesting. Would you think a second dose after emesis would yield success?
A second dose would definitely help
The purpose of this post was to avoid an argument but anyway here's my point, this source has been proven to be more than likely to cause harm than not and honestly, telling people to just take more at 30g than 25g which is should be the standard isn't a good thing in my opinion because at that stage, there could be completely different variables that no one can predict and all that just to compensate for the sources uniqueness doesn't make sense. I'm not even sure this source is discussed as it demonstrated to not be pure enough. Finally, I understand if its worth the risk to others but this post to highlight that this source has been problematic regarding posts from years gone by, there is no necessity on your part to prove anything nor record it, im absolutely against that just to prove the viability of a source.
You might be against it but I have literally nothing to lose, and I've been reevaluating what went wrong last time so this time it works.
Nothing against the standard procedure but if people can't get or even afford sn from other sources I believe this source is a great alternative even if it has a lower purity.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hiro Uchiha
Dante_

Dante_

Global Mod | No future
Feb 27, 2025
332
So clearly the purpose of this thread was completely missed, so I will go as far as to say that if you do take the risk to obtain this source then thats on you but I dont see the incentive in backing a source thats at best inconsistent and more likely to cause harm in the end, sure some may have nothing to lose but is that a fair thing to say for others who dont want to end up suffering for hours on end from this source in particular as its been demonstrated in the past to cause.
 
  • Like
  • Hmph!
Reactions: rozeske, opheliaoveragain and Upon a hanging Body

Similar threads

thesighofleaves
Replies
2
Views
364
Suicide Discussion
thesighofleaves
thesighofleaves
sillyprincessmeow
Replies
5
Views
638
Suicide Discussion
EmptyBottle
EmptyBottle
the_path_of_sorrows
Replies
1
Views
323
Suicide Discussion
eupdplishlp
eupdplishlp
Dante_
Replies
0
Views
376
Suicide Discussion
Dante_
Dante_