About PC SN

[Dante_]

So, lately there's been a bit of discussion about PC SN as a source, quite frankly, this post is for harm reduction purposes...a few years ago, there was a user who attempted with the same source and it ended up being quite a terrible experience so in all honesty, any mention of this source shouldn't be as a viable one and anyone stating that it is and to just drink more than what's in the protocol to compensate for the lower purity is being harmful, whether knowingly or not.

Im alive after ingesting 20g of SN

This was at 4am. After I drank my SN mix. I immediately laid down. I watched my TV for about 10 minutes. Then the horror...I of course, vomited profusely. Yes, I took antiemetics. I laid back down. I could feel my body start to shut down. I remember breathing in agony. I got up and remember...

sanctioned-suicide.net

 

[Upon a hanging Body]

I completely disagree with this , as someone who has taken and survived PC SN.
I feel that it's definitely viable , everything happened exactly how it was supposed to for me besides the amount of puking I went through.

I just believe this source should be treated differently and the procedure for taking it should be chanced compared to how other sources .

If need be I'll go out of my own way to make a procedure and make a record of me ctb in a post just to prove myself and this source.

 

[Dante_]

I completely disagree with this , as someone who has taken and survived PC SN.
I feel that it's definitely viable , everything happened exactly how it was supposed to for me besides the amount of puking I went through.

I just believe this source should be treated differently and the procedure for taking it should be chanced compared to how other sources .

If need be I'll go out of my own way to make a procedure and make a record of me ctb in a post just to prove myself and this source.

The purpose of this post was to avoid an argument but anyway here's my point, this source has been proven to be more than likely to cause harm than not and honestly, telling people to just take more at 30g than 25g which is should be the standard isn't a good thing in my opinion because at that stage, there could be completely different variables that no one can predict and all that just to compensate for the sources uniqueness doesn't make sense. I'm not even sure this source is discussed as it demonstrated to not be pure enough. Finally, I understand if its worth the risk to others but this post to highlight that this source has been problematic regarding posts from years gone by, there is no necessity on your part to prove anything nor record it, im absolutely against that just to prove the viability of a source.

 

[rozeske]

Imo it shouldn't be considered a viable sn source if people follow protocol and survive hours later without medical intervention. It could still be a harmful substance, show similar side effects, cause damage to an extent or even be a lethal one at a certain dosage, it just shouldn't be discussed as the right sn and followed with the same sn protocol.

 

[Hiro Uchiha]

That's interesting. Would you think a second dose after emesis would yield success?

 

[Upon a hanging Body]

That's interesting. Would you think a second dose after emesis would yield success?

A second dose would definitely help

The purpose of this post was to avoid an argument but anyway here's my point, this source has been proven to be more than likely to cause harm than not and honestly, telling people to just take more at 30g than 25g which is should be the standard isn't a good thing in my opinion because at that stage, there could be completely different variables that no one can predict and all that just to compensate for the sources uniqueness doesn't make sense. I'm not even sure this source is discussed as it demonstrated to not be pure enough. Finally, I understand if its worth the risk to others but this post to highlight that this source has been problematic regarding posts from years gone by, there is no necessity on your part to prove anything nor record it, im absolutely against that just to prove the viability of a source.

You might be against it but I have literally nothing to lose, and I've been reevaluating what went wrong last time so this time it works.
Nothing against the standard procedure but if people can't get or even afford sn from other sources I believe this source is a great alternative even if it has a lower purity.

 

[Dante_]

So clearly the purpose of this thread was completely missed, so I will go as far as to say that if you do take the risk to obtain this source then thats on you but I dont see the incentive in backing a source thats at best inconsistent and more likely to cause harm in the end, sure some may have nothing to lose but is that a fair thing to say for others who dont want to end up suffering for hours on end from this source in particular as its been demonstrated in the past to cause.