
TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 7,131
In the past few months, there was a news article about how the Trump administration is seeking the defund the CTB prevention service for LGBTQ+ youth (article linked below):
So this brings up a question for discussion. What would happen (even hypothetically speaking) if the Trump admin decides to ban or even heavily hamper, defund, or dismantle (ideal) the CTB prevention hotline and similar CTB prevention programs that would actively intervene against people who would attempt, ideate, or plan CTB? Personally, even though I did not vote for Trump, I, as a pro-choicer, would be in support of such an action because I understand and seen the paternalistic and authoritarian practices that the hotline as well as CTB prevention programs employ against CTB individuals. While there may be opposition and such, I personally think that if the state won't provide medical assisted death or peaceful, dignified exits for people who really want to go, then at the minimum, laissez faire off bodily autonomy would be step in the right direction, and while there may be more people who may end up CTB'ing, overall, it would still be a net positive towards the overall sum of bodily autonomy for most individuals.
A lot of opponents of such a change may cite that there would be unnecessary people who may end up dying, but the counterargument I have for that is that there would be less people wanting to CTB to begin with and perhaps even more who would open up due to the lessened risk of unwanted intervention and impingment upon one's bodily autonomy as well as civil liberties. Given that scenario (even if hypothetical) what do you think would happen if the Trump admin did something like that, either to a large degree or even to a smaller degree? This includes the rollback, defunding, and even dismantling of similar CTB prevention programs or even making it where the CTB prevention hotline is less prevalent and such.
So this brings up a question for discussion. What would happen (even hypothetically speaking) if the Trump admin decides to ban or even heavily hamper, defund, or dismantle (ideal) the CTB prevention hotline and similar CTB prevention programs that would actively intervene against people who would attempt, ideate, or plan CTB? Personally, even though I did not vote for Trump, I, as a pro-choicer, would be in support of such an action because I understand and seen the paternalistic and authoritarian practices that the hotline as well as CTB prevention programs employ against CTB individuals. While there may be opposition and such, I personally think that if the state won't provide medical assisted death or peaceful, dignified exits for people who really want to go, then at the minimum, laissez faire off bodily autonomy would be step in the right direction, and while there may be more people who may end up CTB'ing, overall, it would still be a net positive towards the overall sum of bodily autonomy for most individuals.
A lot of opponents of such a change may cite that there would be unnecessary people who may end up dying, but the counterargument I have for that is that there would be less people wanting to CTB to begin with and perhaps even more who would open up due to the lessened risk of unwanted intervention and impingment upon one's bodily autonomy as well as civil liberties. Given that scenario (even if hypothetical) what do you think would happen if the Trump admin did something like that, either to a large degree or even to a smaller degree? This includes the rollback, defunding, and even dismantling of similar CTB prevention programs or even making it where the CTB prevention hotline is less prevalent and such.
Last edited: