
one.way.out
Student
- Jul 9, 2021
- 135
I feel like this would be an interesting discussion. If a criminal like them committed suicide, how would you feel about it?
⚠️ UK Access Block Notice: Beginning July 1, 2025, this site will no longer be accessible from the United Kingdom. This is a voluntary decision made by the site's administrators. We were not forced or ordered to implement this block. If you're located in the UK, we recommend using a VPN to maintain access.
Okay...dude....I like you...but this comment is kind of fucking unrealistic and unfoundend. If you are suicidal you don't want to torture to old age...jezzus. Torture and feed them? Or leave them to somehow be fed? God. So dark and unrealistic.Yeah, I'd rather just torture them until they die of old age
Okay...dude....I like you...but this comment is kind of fucking unrealistic and unfoundend. If you are suicidal you don't want to torture to old age...jezzus. Torture and feed them? Or leave them to somehow be fed? God. So dark and unrealistic.
I don't think I saw what you were saying. Yes. Awful satanic sexual sadistic fucks should get all the shit they desere and coming. I'm sorry for whatever. I didn't understand.. I was reading wrong just pissed and sorta intoxicicated.Yes, it's unrealistic, but why shouldn't rapists, pedophiles & murderers be psychologically tortured until they die? I was molested & I'll never get rid of my issues
"I want/feel." Is probably what that means.Define "should".
You could easily include torturers to the list. I'm sure many think they have a reason for doing what they do but does one bad thing justify another?Yeah, I'd rather just torture them until they die of old age
I would rather torture 100 paedos and 1 be innocent than pissant about with them and some go free. If there was 100 and only 1 was a paedo it's still worth it!!!You missed out the word convicted in your thread title question, otherwise it sounds like advocating vigilante branded justice. I'm surprised no one considers miscarriages of justice; the rule of law doesn't always play by the book.
Yes paedos deserve special treatmentYou could easily include torturers to the list. I'm sure many think they have a reason for doing what they do but does one bad thing justify another?
It's posts like yours why the rule of law, when it's exercised properly, exists. Last time I checked this isn't The Purge.I would rather torture 100 paedos and 1 be innocent than pissant about with them and some go free. If there was 100 and only 1 was a paedo it's still worth it!!!
The answers to this will say a lot about people. They might have experience with it themselves. If they don't then it's quite possible they're worse than they are. Great if you're a psychopath and your crimes are socially accepted. That they cared about the victim is a nice excuseIt's posts like yours why the rule of law, when it's exercised properly, exists. Last time I checked this isn't The Purge.
Well I find paedos don't deserve the rule if law. And your purge analogy is rubbish! It's more like lynching what am I saying. I would be perfectly happy living in a world where you could lynch paedos. And last time I checked my fantasies are my business!It's posts like yours why the rule of law, when it's exercised properly, exists. Last time I checked this isn't The Purge.
This is throwing me off a bit. So if there was 100 people, you torture them all just to get that one pedo? Sounds like a waste of time and energy just to get that one pedo rather than doing the due diligence of research and getting the right one instead.If there was 100 and only 1 was a paedo it's still worth it!!!
It would be like the modern day witch trials only for men and the odd woman instead. Roles reversed. 100 for 1 is overkill but think of the thousands getting away with it.This is throwing me off a bit. So if there was 100 people, you torture them all just to get that one pedo? Sounds like a waste of time and energy just to get that one pedo rather than doing the due diligence of research and getting the right one instead.
I seem to have hit a nerve saying I respect that convicted criminals should be dealt with by the rule of law.The answers to this will say a lot about people. They might have experience with it themselves. If they don't then it's quite possible they're worse than they are. Great if you're a psychopath and your crimes are socially accepted. That they cared about the victim is a nice excuse
So you're advocating vigilante justice, as though you embody the rule of law - makes my Purge analogy rather apt. I hope you'd ensure you have evidence of the 100's crimes before lynching, otherwise it's hearsay and people would have right to be concerned if people like you were jurors.Well I find paedos don't deserve the rule if law. And your purge analogy is rubbish! It's more like lynching what am I saying. I would be perfectly happy living in a world where you could lynch paedos. And last time I checked my fantasies are my business!
Your fantasies are allowed as long as you don't make them reality, same as there's. It must be a curse knowing you can't ever have what you want. If they don't act on it they don't deserve to be hated for something they can't helpWell I find paedos don't deserve the rule if law. And your purge analogy is rubbish! It's more like lynching what am I saying. I would be perfectly happy living in a world where you could lynch paedos. And last time I checked my fantasies are my business!
Your purge analogy is rubbish. They have one night where all crime is legal and then the rest of the time its not. How is that anything like pulling paedos out of their houses and stringing them to the nearest lampost?? 24 hours a day 7 days a week 52 weeks of the year, year in year out?I seem to have hit a nerve saying I respect that convicted criminals should be dealt with by the rule of law.
So you're advocating vigilante justice, as though you embody the rule of law - makes my Purge analogy rather apt. I hope you'd ensure you have evidence of the 100's crimes before lynching, otherwise it's hearsay and people would have right to be concerned if people like you were jurors.
Only the ones who destroy children's lives. The ones who look at photos and films of kids keeping the horrific industry goingIf they don't act on it they don't deserve to be hated for something they can't help
I find this interesting after our discussion we had about a girl you know who likes being abused. What's the difference with those guys other than they've found a willing victim? Does that make them better or give them a free pass. How bad something is shouldn't depend on how bad the person it happens to says it is. This is what's wrong with football. Fall over and the person gets a red card, stay on your feet and they don't when what they did was the sameWe should bring back the Spanish Inquisition on rapists and pedophiles. After the conviction is over and they're found guilty of course. Or just ship them to some third world country with a tattoo on their back detailing their crimes and let mob justice handle it.
Your idea of vigilante justice doesn't sound far removed from The Purge, because you're advocating taking the law into your own hands, so my analogy is an apt one unless you're going to eloquently brand it as rubbish again. By your way of thinking, "Commit a crime to deliver justice for a previous crime".Your purge analogy is rubbish. They have one night where all crime is legal and then the rest of the time its not. How is that anything like pulling paedos out of their houses and stringing them to the nearest lampost?? 24 hours a day 7 days a week 52 weeks of the year, year in year out?
Only the ones who destroy children's lives. The ones who look at photos and films of kids keeping the horrific industry going
Well, in the context of BDSM, she has consented to being treated in that fashion, whereas a rapist doesn't need consent to do what they do. Both parties consented to the action they're about to partake. The person becomes an abuser when they force it upon a person that did not consent to it.I find this interesting after our discussion we had about a girl you know who likes being abused.
Yeah I grasp the notion of the law but I don't think it's that simple in terms of separating the good from the bad. If she'd decided she didn't like it they'd be on the list whereas the if the offenders you're talking about had chosen her she might have found her true love. There's loads of people who aren't in prison worse than those that are. A lot of it comes down to circumstance and luckWell, in the context of BDSM, she has consented to being treated in that fashion, whereas a rapist doesn't need consent to do what they do. Both parties consented to the action they're about to partake. The person becomes an abuser when they force it upon a person that did not consent to it.
You've clearly never watched the purge. Your analogy is rubbishhhhhhYour idea of vigilante justice doesn't sound far removed from The Purge, because you're advocating taking the law into your own hands, so my analogy is an apt one unless you're going to eloquently brand it as rubbish again. By your way of thinking, "Commit a crime to deliver justice for a previous crime".