i've graphed some data points per 1000 pages, and it seems to be that there's an avarage of a +27.5 increase. there's a 30 replies for page, so 27.5 out of 30 replies are increasers (91.6667%) and 2.5 out of 30 are decreasers (0.0833%)
-
⚠️ UK Access Block Notice: Beginning July 1, 2025, this site will no longer be accessible from the United Kingdom. This is a voluntary decision made by the site's administrators. We were not forced or ordered to implement this block. If you're located in the UK, we recommend using a VPN to maintain access.
i've graphed some data points per 1000 pages, and it seems to be that there's an avarage of a +27.5 increase. there's a 30 replies for page, so 27.5 out of 30 replies are increasers (91.6667%) and 2.5 out of 30 are decreasers (0.0833%)
EvisceratedJester
|| What Else Could I Be But a Jester ||
- Oct 21, 2023
- 4,934
Your results look pretty different from mine
Would you mind explaining how you got these results?
there's probably alot of deviation, but i don't know how to autiomatically scrape posts automatically
Namelesa
Global Mod · Trapped in this Suffering
- Sep 21, 2024
- 1,930
you probably thought of cock too much when you were trying to get your results as so your analysis became less accurate. /joke
Last edited:
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/upthfijkjy here's the graph if you want to edit it
Similar threads
- VitaminD3
- Suicide Discussion
Suicide Discussion
Ann M.
- VitaminD3
- Politics & Philosophy
Politics & Philosophy
VitaminD3
